BP greenwashing grievance units precedent for motion on deceptive advert campaigns

Right this moment, it was introduced that an OECD grievance filed by ClientEarth legal professionals alleging oil large BP misled the general public in its promoting marketing campaign would have proceeded had the corporate not already dedicated to finish the advert marketing campaign.

In a call that units a precedent for complaints towards company greenwashing, the UK Nationwide Contact Level for the OECD Pointers for Multinational Enterprises (NCP) has assessed ClientEarth’s world first grievance as being materials and substantiated, regardless of the grievance not continuing on account of BP ending its advert marketing campaign.

Our grievance towards BP

In December 2019, ClientEarth legal professionals lodged a grievance alleging BP’s international ‘Hold Advancing’ and ‘Potentialities In all places’ advert campaigns misled the general public by specializing in BP’s low carbon vitality merchandise, when greater than 96% of BP’s annual spend is on oil and fuel.

In February 2020, BP withdrew its ads and its CEO Bernard Looney stated they might not get replaced beneath the corporate’s new coverage promising an finish to ‘company repute promoting’. He additionally dedicated BP to redirecting its promoting assets in direction of advocating for progressive local weather insurance policies.

Right this moment the NCP, which sits throughout the UK’s Division for Worldwide Commerce, launched its preliminary evaluation of ClientEarth’s grievance, which won’t proceed additional given BP has already withdrawn the marketing campaign in query.

Exposing deceptive advertisements

ClientEarth lawyer Sophie Marjanac stated: “Oil and fuel corporations are spending thousands and thousands to persuade the general public of their social licence to function and deflect from their function in quickly heating the planet.

“Our grievance known as on BP to take down its promoting, and we welcome its resolution to take action. We took subject with BP giving the impression that it’s racing to renewables, that its fuel is cleaner, and that it’s a part of the local weather answer, when the overwhelming majority of its spend continues to be on fossil fuels.”

A precedent towards greenwashing

In its resolution, the NCP discovered that ClientEarth had a professional curiosity within the grievance, and that it was materials and substantiated.

Marjanac added: “Right this moment’s resolution units a precedent for folks to make use of the OECD pointers to carry corporations to account for his or her greenwashing on the idea of client pursuits – together with of their promoting. Fossil gas corporations utilizing promoting to mislead the general public over their local weather affect have been placed on discover.

“Ideally all fossil gas promoting needs to be banned until it comes with a tobacco-style well being warning concerning the dangers of local weather change, together with the risks of constant to extract and burn fossil fuels. The general public shouldn’t be misled, and fossil gas corporations should be accountable for the harm they do.”

The put up BP greenwashing grievance units precedent for motion on deceptive advert campaigns appeared first on ClientEarth.