In the present day, EU Fee president Ursual von der Leyen gave her State of the Union speech in Brussels.
Our Head of EU Affairs, Anaïs Berthier was listening, and seen a worrying discrepancy when it got here to the atmosphere.
Reacting to the speech, she stated: “The Fee is correct to reject the established order and goal for systemic change for the atmosphere and public well being however there’s a discrepancy between phrases and deeds right here.
“For instance, agriculture is a big supply of air pollution, air pollution which damages our well being and the atmosphere, however the CAP is being adopted on the legislative proposal that predates each this Fee and the adoption of the European Inexperienced Deal (EGD).
“The CAP isn’t aligned with the EGD and the Farm to Fork technique. That is the established order and at odds with the precept of consistency enshrined within the EU Treaty. Systemic change isn’t taking place right here, which signifies that the atmosphere and public well being should not going to enhance.
“The EU finances nonetheless subsidies fossil fuels. That is the established order. Simply yesterday the Parliament voted on the Simply Transition Fund and agreed to let in a big derogation for fossil gasoline.”
“It’s additionally not sufficient to emphasize the significance of the rule of regulation, it must be embedded in precise choices. There must be robust conditionality within the EU finances and the Subsequent technology EU plan with a strong mechanism to make sure compliance from Member States which profit from EU monetary help.
Berthier concluded: “So nice phrases must be matched with robust motion. In any other case this Fee will hold the established order, which is unhealthy for the atmosphere and for public well being.”
The put up Key EU Fee speech: gaps between phrases and motion appeared first on ClientEarth.